On December 15, 2025, in Guaíba (near Porto Alegre, Brazil), a storm with gusts reported around 80–90 km/h toppled a ~30-meter replica of the Statue of Liberty installed outside a Havan megastore. Videos of the figure slowly bending and then crashing onto the parking lot went viral; no injuries were reported, and the concrete base reportedly remained standing.
For many viewers, it looked like more than weather and engineering. The Statue of Liberty isn’t only metal and concrete—it’s an icon of freedom, democratic restraint, and the promise that power answers to law. And when a symbol falls, people instinctively ask whether an idea is wobbling too.
There’s an old notion in esoteric traditions—sympathetic magic, the “voodoo logic” of a copy tied to an original: harm the representation, and you “echo” the condition of what it represents. You don’t have to believe in mysticism to feel why this metaphor grips: the replica’s collapse in Brazil becomes a visual parable for the stress fractures in the American democratic myth itself.
Because the U.S. is living through an era where the temptation of personal rule is no longer taboo language. President Donald Trump has long projected fascination with strongmen—and critics have described it as a kind of “autocrat envy,” a jealousy of leaders like Vladimir Putin who can act without checks, courts, or messy accountability.
And while America’s democratic institutions make a full autocratic conversion harder, the direction of travel can still be pushed—step by step, norm by norm.
We’ve seen what these steps can look like in practice:
Pressure on independent institutions is rarely announced as “ending democracy.” It arrives as “restoring order,” “punishing enemies,” “cleaning up corruption,” “fixing bias.” Yet it still functions as pressure—on courts, on prosecutors, on civil servants, on anyone whose job is to say “no.”
Pressure on the press doesn’t need censorship boards when you can exhaust media through intimidation, delegitimization, and legal warfare—turning journalism into “enemy” territory in the public imagination while keeping the formal constitution intact.
Troops in cities—even framed as crime control—cross a psychological line: the state begins to look like it’s policing politics with force. In late 2025, multiple reports described costly National Guard deployments to major U.S. cities, some facing court challenges and orders to withdraw.
And there’s another line—darker, because it touches the ultimate democratic taboo: killing without due process under the comfort of a convenient label.
And this isn’t abstract. In the Caribbean, there have been accusations that U.S. forces destroyed small boats after branding them “pirate” craft or “drug-runner” vessels—without trial or investigation, on the strength of a label alone. Then families and local communities spoke up: among the dead, they said, were ordinary Latin American fishermen, people who went to sea not with cocaine, but with nets. And even if officials call these “security operations,” for a democracy it looks like a dangerous drift—when suspicion replaces due process, and the word “pirate” becomes a license to strike.
That’s not “democracy collapsing overnight.” That’s democracy stretching—and discovering that, under the right narrative, even lethal force can slide away from transparent accountability.
This is why the Brazil footage resonated: a tall, familiar figure leaning… leaning… and then the sudden inevitability of impact.
History warns us that democracies often die not in one coup, but in a chain of “exceptions” that become routine. Hitler is the classic example of a leader who entered power through legal means and then hollowed the system from inside—using fear, emergency logic, and institutional capture. The point isn’t to claim America is Nazi Germany. The point is to recognize the mechanism: legitimacy is used to dismantle legitimacy.
And here the parallel you drew turns into a moral mirror: Putin rains missiles onto ordinary Ukrainian cities—onto apartment blocks, playgrounds, hospitals—and then offers an absurd, obscene explanation: they were “Nazis.” As if children and women pulled from the rubble can be rewritten into enemies by a word. The world watches this brutal inversion in real time: the accusation becomes a permission slip, a propaganda stamp meant to disinfect slaughter.
And that’s the chilling truth: when a state normalizes the logic of “they don’t deserve rights, they’re X,” it’s not just spinning rhetoric—it’s laying the track for atrocities. Because once you can label civilians as monsters, anything becomes “justified.” And in that moment, the one acting like a Nazi is not the dead child in a peaceful city—it’s the regime that bombs the city and calls it virtue.
So no, the fallen statue in Guaíba doesn’t prove fate, or magic, or prophecy. But it does what symbols do: it compresses a complex anxiety into one unforgettable image.
A reminder that freedom is not a monument you inherit. It’s a structure you maintain—by defending courts that can say “no,” a press that can investigate without fear, and a public that refuses the comforting lie that “our side” deserves unchecked power.
Because once a society accepts unchecked power as “efficient,” it eventually learns the price: efficiency becomes permission.
No comments:
Post a Comment